The problem of determining the rate implicit in a lease also presented a concern that most preparers used the incremental borrowing rate (IBR) as the discount rate. However, that wasn’t the only concern that came to light during FASB’s roundtable in September 2020. Apart from the rate implicit, members also discussed the IBR; i.e., how those that have adopted ASC 842 determine the IBR. It was recognized that a lot of time and effort goes into estimating the borrowing rate.The ProblemFor Non-Public Business Entity (Non-PBE) lessees, a risk-free rate is determined which uses a periodset in the lease terms (paragraph 842-20-30-3). This risk-free rate was another cause for concern at the roundtable. The use of this risk-free rate under the current economic climate meant low rates and therefore high artificial lease liabilities, thus being potentially misleading for users. When the costs incurred to determine the IBR, and the prospect of usinga risk-free rate were combined, a question arose whether non-public business entities as well as public should be allowed to use some other rate or not.Alternatives ProposedBased on the argument, FASB proposed two alternatives to the members, preparers, and users in the roundtable handout.
No change. The rate and method used right now to determine and use IBR for PBE and non-PBEs should remain the same.
Both PBE and non-PBE lessees must use a market-specific rate instead of IBR.
When the two alternatives were discussed, following were the respective arguments for and against the prospects.
Non-PBE would encounter issues when trying to determine IBR that falls on the definition presented in ASC 842 for IBR. The problem they would face would primarily be that they don’t have enough resources or departments that can determine a lease credit risk. However, if nothing is done, it is important to remember that the cost of determining IBR will only go down on a go-forward basis.
The second alternative suggested that a rate be recommended like in ASC 944 (Insurance) and ASC 715 (Compensation). The use of this rate would significantly simplify the whole process, not to mention result in more uniform and comparable books. The problem here is that the rate may be very different from risk-free rates that non-PBEs use.
The DecisionMost participants agreed that the first alternative is much better, i.e., current requirements for IBR should remain the same for public companies. Preparers agreed that creating a new process for IBR would cost even more,though they agreed that post–implementation costs would be lesser. Since usersmostly useDisclosures to compare and evaluate companies, IBR didn’t really make much of a difference there.However, this was all limited to PBEs. When it came to non-PBEs, most members were in favor of making adjustments to thestandard.The change in ASC 842, if any, would be targeted toward allowing non-PBEs to choose whether they use the risk-free rate on:
An asset-class basis
Or for the whole entity.
It was acknowledgedthere was a certain arbitration involved by allowing non-PBEs to use risk-free rates.To that end, members mostly were in favor of letting the FASB determine a specific rate for non-PBEs and implementing it via ASC 842.
Try iLeasePro for free right now; https://www.ileasepro.com/signup/free/
You can take a video tour of iLeasePro or schedule some time on our online demo calendar to see how iLeasePro can help you and your firm comply to the ASC 842 Standard.
iLease Management LLC (“iLease”), developer of iLeasePro, an enterprise cloud-based Lease Management and Accounting solution, has announced a major step forward in its strategic partnership and integration with Sage Intacct, a leader in cloud-based financial management and accounting software. iLease has released the capability to take advantage of Sage Intacct’s dimension feature to seamlessly track and report lease related financial and operational data.
The Sage Intacct dimension feature offers an entirely new way to track and report on financial and operational data, while simplifying the user’s chart of accounts. With dimensions, a user “tags” a transaction with certain designations such as department, location, etc., without the need to expand the chart of accounts. By adding this new feature, an iLeasePro user can tag any dimension to the general ledger accounts associated with the lease. Once tagged, the iLeasePro user can automatically generate the journal entries with the dimensions and via webservices, upload the journal entries into the Sage Intacct general ledger.
“We are excited that we have made a major step forward in our integration with Sage Intacct,” stated Sean Egan, Managing Partner iLease Management LLC. “It was clear in speaking with Sage Intacct users that the dimensions is such an important feature to their operating efficiency and reporting. Adding dimensions to iLeasePro only strengthens the seamless synchronization of key lease accounting data between the two solutions.”
“We are pleased iLeasePro continues to enhance their integration with Sage Intacct. As the requirements for monitoring and tracking lease details expand, iLeasePro’s enabling the power of Sage Intacct Dimensions will improve reporting and insight for our mutual customers.“ Chris Rose, Vice President of Business Development at Sage Intacct.
The problem of determining the rate implicit in a lease also presented a concern that most preparers used the incremental borrowing rate (IBR) as the discount rate. However, that wasn’t the only concern that came to light during FASB’s roundtable in September 2020.
Apart from the rate implicit, members also discussed the IBR; i.e., how those that have adopted ASC 842 determine the IBR. It was recognized that a lot of time and effort goes into estimating the borrowing rate.
The Problem
For Non-Public Business Entity (Non-PBE) lessees, a risk-free rate is determined which uses a period set in the lease terms (paragraph 842-20-30-3). This risk-free rate was another cause for concern at the roundtable. The use of this risk-free rate under the current economic climate meant low rates and therefore high artificial lease liabilities, thus being potentially misleading for users.
When the costs incurred to determine the IBR, and the prospect of using a risk-free rate were combined, a question arose whether non-public business entities as well as public should be allowed to use some other rate or not.
Alternatives Proposed
Based on the argument, FASB proposed two alternatives to the members, preparers, and users in the roundtable handout.
